Why not use an in-house abstraction?

• Related Articles

• Why not use an in-house abstraction?

  Developing in-house OS abstraction requires considerable Time, resources and money Planning to support multiple OS Detailed knowledge of low-level OS functions and interfaces Development Testing Maintenance Up front cost associated with purchase of ...

• Why don’t I use an open source porting kit or abstraction layer?

  Open-source solutions are limited, unsupported and risky. MapuSoft provides you fully supported porting and abstraction solutions that are more reliable since they were developed working with the OS vendors themselves.

• What is required to add target support for my In-house OS to AppCOE?

  Adding support for an in-house OS can be easily done by our India development team for a nominal fee. Validation can also be done by MapuSoft or yourself. In order to estimate the work, we need to know more about the OS functions in your In-house OS, ...

• Why use a standardized OS interface?

  Using a standardized OS interface architecture will Reduce the learning curve associated with adopting a new OS by using intuitive, flexible and standard APIs across multiple operating systems Protect software investment by enabling efficient ...

• Why use POSIX Interface on a POSIX based OS?

  Benefits only provided by POSIX Interface from Cross-OS: Includes OS Abstractor APIs - Allows development of highly portable applications True Portability - Code written for an older version of POSIX will run on a newer version - Code written for one ...